Minggu, 04 November 2012

KUNJUNGAN DIPLOMATIC FEDERAL RISERVE

JAS MERAH DAN JAS PUTIH

KONFRENSI PERS DI BANK INDONESIA _0001.3gp

PRESS RILISE UN SWISSINDO DI HI_0001.3gp

PETISI PRESIDENT UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION .3gp

UN DAY 0001

PUTUSAN BIG TOP ROYAL K 681 . MR.SINO.AS_.3gp

WAWANCARA MR SINO AS

Liputan khusus wawancara MR.A1.SINO.AS.mp4

WHO AM I: PUTUSAN BIG TOP ROYAL K 681 . MR.SINO.AS_.3gp

WHO AM I: PUTUSAN BIG TOP ROYAL K 681 . MR.SINO.AS_.3gp

HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECT








PENGENALAN DINI

HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECT
Material InI Lisensi Patent Hukum Perjanjian
SECRET CONTROL MONETARY FINANCE SYSTEM



MELIPUTI:

EXHIBITS AB
HUMAN OBLIGATION
PENGENALAN DINI DAN WINATA LAKSANA

DIMENSIA OBLIGASI MANUSIA
DI LIMA BENUA (193) NEGARA

DARMA IBU PERTIWI

KEADILAN SOSIAL BAGI SELURUH RAKYAT INDONESIA
DAN
MERCUSUAR DUNIA

TULANG PUNGGUNG DAN TULANG RUSUK K.A.R NEGARA

ISIM A1 & B2
STNA 369

GANEFO+OOO+O1 UN-SWISSINDO

INA: 117.113.112-ITJ

PROGRAM
INVESTMENT-ASSET-BANKING SYSTEM
NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF 300-THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIC AGENCT
UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
(PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA)

OLEH:
CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONALITY
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
BADAN INDUK LEMBAGA TINGGI TERTINGGI NEGARA [AAE.A2] SEMESTA ALAM
OWNER:
UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM

PENDAHULUAN
LATAR BELAKANG
PENELUSURAN MASALAH
ASAL –USUL SEJARAH
POKOK PERSOALAN GLOBAL
ADAT BUDAYA DAN AGAMA
POKOK PERSOALAN
PERSONAL
ASSET
BANGKING SYSTEM
PROGRAM HUMAN OBLIGATION
JAMINAN BIAYA HIDUP UMAT SEDUNIA
PER-KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK DUNIA-INDONESIA
BANK-BANK PELAKSANA
 


1.NASIONAL INDONESIA
2.INTERNASIONAL NEGARA ANGGOTA PBB-5 BENUA
DILAKSANAKAN DARI TINGKAT DESA
DIKETUAI KEPALA DESA/KONSULTAN TINGKAT DESA
KOORDINATOR TINGKAT RW/RT
FUNGSI HUMAN OBLIGATION-OBLIGASI MANUSIA
BERDASAR PROPOSAL
JAMINAN OTOMATIS PER-BULAN
SELAKU ALAT BAYAR

BERLAKU DALAM BENTUK ATM-U/KTP-ELEKTRONIK

MASA BERLAKU
TIDAK BISA DIWARISKAN
STATUS HUKUM KEYNESS DAN ONGKO WIJOYO
"ESTWO ATM-U SENILAI JAMINAN CETAK STANDAR SAH BAYAR MATA UANG DUNIA"

SINGLE TRANSACTION
"PRICE ORDER LEGAL TENDER"
ESTWO CLEAR MATA UANG TUNGGAL DUNIA
BERBENTUK CURRENCY CARD ELEKTRONIK

CERTIFY OF CASH MONEY
GARANSI PEMBAYARAN NO. 1872498092-UBS
UNTUK PEMBAYARAN DEBT PRIVATE & PUBLIK

WORLD BANK NOTES
DIKELUARKAN OLEH:
PUSAT BANK DUNIA RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A

DIDISTRIBUSIKAN OLEH:
COORDINATES BANK: BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ.LTD

TYPE CASH MONEY
BERBENTUK CARD ESTWO
PENERIMA SELURUH RAKYAT INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE PEMILIK KTP/SSN, MINIMAL UMUR 17 TAHUN.

GARANSI TRANSAKSI
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD

SPIRITUAL BOY DI:
INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE
DI ENAM (96) PRIME BANK
1. BNI.
2. BCA.
3. BRI.
4. DANAMON.
5. MANDIRI.
6. LIPPO BANK GROUP (CIMB-NIAGA).

GARANSI INTERNASIONAL
DEPOSIT CONTROL STATEMENT INVEST DEPOSIT

ORDER: PERSONAL ONLY
GARANSI ASSET JAMINAN HIDUP UMAT SEDUNIA:
1. Exhibit Gold Certificate UBS No.001-No.235 dan Holder Certificate UBS Total: 74.760.920.184 KGs.
2. Account Code Asset & Account Code Funds-SUPER SEMMAR
Exhibit A-11 dan Exhibit B-11.
3. Account Data Sheets Audit akhir TGL. 01 Desember, 2008/2012.
4. Seri-Seri Asset 01-4 meliputi Register Induk Tanah-Tanah
Eigendom Perponding (Pembayar Pajak, Hak Sewa, Hak Guna):
* Pertambangan
* Perkebunan
Pertanian
* Perhubungan (darat-laut-udara).

5. Warehouse AN.ACT.147, 1903 Meliputi:
Warehouse 77, Cakra 55 dan G.7.
6. Sertifikat Induk 25 Negara-INDONESIA.

MATA UANG TUNGGAL DUNIA
Adalah:
LISENSI PATENT PERJANJIAN SWISSINDO
Kesatuan Kepamilikan SECRET ORGANIZATION UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL, Badan Induk Bank:
* WORLD BANK
* UBS A.G
* BANK INDONESIA
$ FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

OWNER ACTUAL GENUINE CURRENCY PAPER-MONEY WORLD (GOLD & SILVER COINS), ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL FOR THE TREASURY TAX & LOAN PROGRAM (31 CFR 203).

12-12/2012 DECONTRUCTION
PERUBAHAN DAN PENGGUNAAN MATA UANG KERTAS (gOLD & sILVER cOINS) STANDAR SAH BAYAR MATA UANG DUNIA, KEDALAM OTORITA VETO: SEALED REGISTERED WORLD PROGRAM MEDALLIO HELPING ONE HUNDRED YEARS TO CREATE THE FUTURE
ON USING
INTEGRATED GLOBAL PAYMENT

OTORITA PERJANJIAN BANK NASIONAL INTERNASIONAL

WORLD BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM NOTES SERIAL 12.12.2012.

CARD CURRENCY ESTWO (ATM-U) ELEKTRONIK, ALAT BAYAR HUMAN OBLIGATIONS DISELURUH DUNIA ALAM SAPU JAGAD PAMUNGKAS CAKRA BUWANA, SERI ON SESUAI NOMOR-NOMOR KTP/SSN BERNILAI COLLATERAL DAN CASH COLLATERAL, MASING-MASING PEMEGANG KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK DUNIA, INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE, SENILAI ESTWO CURRENCY CARD IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM "KEYNESS LAW" DALAM SYMBOL N$2. DALAM DESAIN SERI 1928/2012 US$.1.000.000. FIXED RATE= N$2.1 / US$. 225.

SALAKU COLLATERAL & CASH COLLATERAL CARD SETARA DENGAN N$2.225.000.000 NILAI MASING-MASING KTP/SSN SESUAI NO. REGISTER KTP/SSN DISELURUH DUNIA.

HAK PENGGUNAAN PER-KTP/SSN
SENILAI US$. 6.000.000

HAK OTOMATIS JAMINAN BIAYA HIDUP MANUSIA DIDUNIA SENILAI: US$. 600.
FIXED RATE US$.1 / Rp.9.200

DILAKSANAKAN OLEH RAKYAT INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE (193 NEGARA) SESUAI:

1. PROGRAM INTEGRASI PEMBAYARAN GLOBAL.
2. PROGRAM REKRUTMENT TENAGA KERJA /S.D.M
DEPARTMENT PEMERINTAH GLOBAL ," DEPARTMENT WORLD
RESOURCE OF POPULATIONS.
3. SERTIFIKASI KONTRAK-KONTRAK PEMBAYARAN EXHIBITS AB.
4. PROGRAM-PROGRAM KATALOG BANK DUNIA.
5. SILA KE V.
6. PASAL 1 AYAT 1, PASAL 32, PASAL 33 AYAT 3.
7. FATF-GAFI RECOMMENDATION 1-IX (40+9)
ANTI MONEY LOUNDERING, DRUG & TERORISM.
8. COUNTERFEIGHTING PARTY & COUNTERFEIGHTING
COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, VIENA 1934.
9. GLOBAL IMMUNITY FRN. 0831934.
10. REGULATIONS E-BIS.
11. FINAL RULE ASBLP-0333902-2010.
12. GRANT'S GOV'T TEAM-FED.USA.
13. ABSOLUTE TITLE.

GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
Sino.AS Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.
(President Besar PBB-UN-SWISSINDO)

Dan:

Ban Ki Moon ( Sec.Gend-UN-SWISSINDO)
Patricia O’Brien (Legal Affair-UN-SWISSINDO)
Achim Steiner (Executive Director UNEP-SWISSINDO)

Hal tersebut diatas adalah bagian TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO, Bersama Jawaban dan Tantangan Dunia, Alfa Omega 0102.

PENGAMANAN
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
(NATO-SEATO-NON BLOCK)

Konsultan & Kontraktor Tunggal.
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
CODE: 062.119.153

TREATY EVENT UN SWISSINDO










YOU I

D.T.C
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
WHITE SPIRITUAL WONDER BOY
S.A.W. CODE 0016802
CARDINAL K.P.H.B.P.G.0.1.0.9
MANDIRI 0.1.0.9.17845.000.000

RULE & REGULATIONS

MANDATE OF AUTHORITY
GENERAL POWER ATTORNEY OF ATTORNEY

THE BANK IS RESPONSIBILE
CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM
AUDITED MATURED DATE DECEMBER 01, 2008-2012
CONTRACT PAYMENT
US$. 920,000,000,000,000,000.00

UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND-UBS AG
Zurich-Swizerland
Cirebon-Indonesia
RS.27486098. A. 48 (1-6)

BY
DEWAN IKATAN DOCUMENT OF INTERNATIONAL
CROWN COUNCIL XIII

************************************************
ABSOLUTE TITLES
K4451. A336 A514 1946,
ACTE FINAL DELA CONFERENCE MONETAIRE ET FINANCIERS DES NATIONS UNIES (BRETTON WOODS, NEW-HAMSHIRE, U.S.A., 1 ER JULLIET-22 JUILLET 1944).
UNITED NATION ORGANIZATIONS MONETARY AND FINANCIAL CONFERENCE (1944: BRETTON WOODS, N.H.).

HOLDING 1 copy Available at LAW-WB-WORLD BANK LAW RESOURCES CENTER in WB.
1 copy Totall in all locations.

Conference author United Nation Organizations Monetary and Financial Conference
(1944: Bretton Woods, N.H.).

Title Acte final de la Conference Monetarire et financiere des Nations Unies
(Bretton Woods, New Hamshire, U.S.A., 1er Julliet – 22 Julliet 1944).

Publication info Paris: Imp-Nationale 1946

Subject: World Bank
Subject: IMF
Subject: IBRD
Subject: LAW-WB
Subject: Keyness LAW
************************************************

JOIN RESOLUTION J.R.98
SECTION 3A101 OF TITLES 31
UNITED STATE CODE

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.

This Document using Power Attorney of Attorney, Signatory Guarantee Medallion of the basis historical legal back ground and coverage.

Principles::

This is Intruction AFIDAVIT Form
For Executed Global Payment and Transfer completed regulations UBS Master Funds, Treasury Master Funds, Free-Tax Master Funds, US Treasury, H.M. Treasury King of King's AM-1 SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS TO ALL MEDIUM TRANSACTION AND PRINCIPLE INSTRUCTION AUTOMATED PROCEDURAL INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION MT.799-MT.103 AND COMPLETED PUBLISHER, RTGS BY ICC-458 WORLD BANK OFFICE OF THE PUBLISHER, 1818 H Street N.W. Washington D.C. U.S.A.

For Compliting Agenda The World Bank Responsibility

HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECT
D.T.C
www.dtc.org
CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONALITY
2012 Annual Meetings, Washington D.C.
Boards of Governors
International Monetary Fund
World Bank Group
2012—Tokyo, Japan

MANDATE OF AUTHORITY
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
ALBISRAIDER AC.USD.P.1568-1120 BANK OFFICER 8040 SWITZERLAND
S.B.C SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECT 80A OCHZZ COORDINATES BANK, ZURICH
OWNER CENTRAL BANKS
BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A INDONESIA
(BANK GUARANTEE UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND)
REPRESENTATIVES BY
BANK OF TOKYO-MITSIBISHI UFJ.LTD

Upcoming / Previous Meetings
IMF Home
World Bank Home
日本語 • Español • Français • عربي • Indonesia

FOR
SUPPORT THE WORLD BANK IS TRUE 2013
THE WORLD BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A
THE WORLD BANK NOTES IS ESTWO “N$2” FOR 2017
FIXED RATE N$2.1 / US$. 225

FED:
AGENCY: OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY

FINAL RULE & REGULATIONS
Subject: Short-Term Investment Funds
Date: October 10, 2012

To: Chief Executive Officers of All National Banks and Federal Savings Associations, Federal Branches and Agencies, Department and Division Heads, All Examining Personnel, and Other Interested Parties



Description: Final Rule

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published a final rule in the Federal Register on October 9, 2012, that revises the requirements imposed on U.S. banks and federal branches of foreign banks pursuant to 12 CFR 9.18(b)(4)(ii)(B), the short-term investment fund (STIF) rule.

A STIF is a type of collective investment fund (CIF) that operates pursuant to a plan that governs a bank’s management and administration of the fund. For admissions to and withdrawals from the fund, a bank may value STIF assets on an amortized cost basis, provided that the STIF plan includes certain requirements, rather than marking the assets to market, which is the valuation method required for other CIFs. Currently, a STIF plan must require the bank to: (1) maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days or less, (2) accrue on a straight-line basis the difference between the cost and the anticipated principal receipt on maturity, and (3) hold the fund’s assets until maturity under usual circumstances.1

The final rule revises and adds to these requirements. Under the final rule, a STIF will be required to
• operate with a primary objective to maintain a stable net asset value (NAV) of $1.00 per participating interest;
• have a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity of 60 days (revised down from 90 days);
• have a dollar-weighted average portfolio life maturity of 120 days;
• adopt (1) portfolio and issuer qualitative standards and concentration restrictions and (2) standards to address contingency funding needs;
• adopt shadow pricing procedures—one that reflects the value of a fund’s assets at amortized cost and another that reflects the market value of the fund’s assets—and calculate the difference on at least a weekly basis;
• adopt procedures for stress testing the STIF’s ability to maintain a stable NAV and report adverse stress testing results to the managing bank’s senior risk management;
• provide monthly disclosures to STIF plan participants and the OCC;
• adopt procedures that require a bank that administers a STIF to notify the OCC before or within one business day after the occurrence of one or more of six specific events;
• use mark-to-market value accounting instead of amortized cost accounting if the market value of the portfolio falls below a NAV of $0.995 per participating interest; and
• adopt procedures to take certain actions if a bank suspends or limits withdrawals and initiates liquidation of the STIF as a result of redemptions.

The final rule applies directly to national banks and federal branches of foreign banks that act in a fiduciary capacity and manage a STIF. As a result of cross-references in the rules applicable to federal savings associations, the final rule also will apply indirectly to those institutions. Based on information reported as of June 30, 2012, however, no federal savings associations were managing STIFs.

The OCC will continue to evaluate the requirements of its STIF regulations in light of future policy assessments and initiatives concerning similar types of funds, such as money market mutual funds, and will take additional actions as appropriate.

The effective date of the final rule is July 1, 2013.

Further Information

You may direct questions or comments to:
Joel Miller, Group Leader, Asset Management, at (202) 874-4493; David Barfield, National Bank Examiner, Market Risk Division, at (202) 874-1829; Patrick Tierney, Counsel, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, at (202) 874-5090; or Suzette Greco, Assistant Director, Securities and Corporate Practices Division, at (202) 874-5210.

Daniel P. Stipano

Acting Chief Counsel+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

on behalf
Release Unlimited ad452106/66/12

The Great President of the United Nations Petition
BA1 (Official 1, Exhibit A) (9/97/12)

before
TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
PROGRAM URGENT CONFINDENTIAL 20-21, 23-24 DECEMBER 2012

NOTED:++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To all your Team with this letter full adoption for prepared forward this Documentary Bank to completed The Bank is Responsible for support treaty Event UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONA in Indonesia because the mean time is urgent 2012 for support us and principle for coordination to 193 of the UN-Members.
Through Trustme Nex Time, Annual Meetings Events:
October 9 - 14, 2012.
REF. CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010/2012.++++++++++++

Best Regard, to all your attention and completed your report to us.
I want to talk you again, Thank's Very Much.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Congratulations History Registered World Program
Annual Meetings Events: Treaty Event UN-SWISSINDO
October 9 - 14, 2012
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


YOU I

IN THE HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 1249
P1.PKC.CIREBON-NKRI

Big Top Royal, K681 King of King's AM-1
The Great President of the United Nation Organization

/S/ST/GG/552/2012

MR.A1.SINO.AS.S.S.ST





http://sphotos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/304392_427920703934089_813434378_n.jpg

2012 JIMBARAN BALI
INDONESIA MERCUSUAR DUNIA
TRUSTME NEX TIME

DEPOSIT CONTROL STATEMENT INVEST DEPOSIT
RESPONSIBILITY OF UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
BIG TOP FRONT INTERNATIONAL

HISTORY REGISTERED WORLD PROGRAM
PATENT LICENSEE SWISSINDO AGREEMENT

BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681
THE MASTER KEY INDONESIA KING OF KING'S AM-1

UNITED NATIONS




AUTHORIZATION DEFENSE
THE POLICE MAN OF MILITARY
CERTIFICATE EXCELLENCE ON EXECUTION
MULTINATIONAL IN OPERATION
AL BISRAIDER AC.USP.P.1568-1120 BANK OFFICER 8040, SWITZERLAND-INDONESIA
SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS SWIFT 80A OCHZZ COORDINATES BANK, ZURICH-CUREBON
CODE INA: 117.113.112.ITJ
**************
MORNING STAR THE SPIRITUAL WONDER BOY
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) and (TADF) Tactical Air Defense Services
AUTHENTICITY OF CERTIFICATE
(12 CFR 4)

Under Crown Council 13-Dewan Ikatan Document of International Certificate Code 99.98 Series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones) International Mandate The Great President of the United Nation Organization Final Rule ASBLP-0333902-2010 (The International Commottee of 300-The International Organic Agency-United Nation Organization) by F.L.O Big Top Royal, K.681 The Master Key Indonesia King of King’s AM-I from Nationals and Republic of Indonesia ownership NKRI 17-8-1945 The Founding Father’s Regional International Institutions of the SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT code W3C-International Court of Justice INA: 117.113.112.ITJ.

UBS UNPRI, UN-Principle For Responsibility Investment of Nations and IPO-Investment one on part Investment Regulations S Rule 903 or 904-SEC Regulations. Investment Lending Portfolio, Investment Lending Law, Aplicable Law completed counterfeiting party and counterfeiting comptroller of the currency BA1 (Official 1, Exhibit A) (9/97), JOINT RESOLUTION J.R.98 OF SECTION 3A101 TITLE 31, H.R. 1249, United State Code Grants Gov’t Team (THREAD ID;1-1TB79N) and TICKET UBS 1319126, Registered BIGDATA Summit BIGD10E.

It’s all full coverage Exhibit A Instruction and Exhibit B Mortgage Statement for finishing PETITION overtake order Responsibility of Nation and peoples. OMB-Office Management Budget For Keeps International Transaction and Treaties International Agrement for this mission using Form ANNEX A3 Publication ICC-458 Completed Number Account Authorizations.

S.O.E-Special Operation Executive by Multinational in Operation with Bugedting Value of Amount US$. 3 ,000,000,000,000.00 with progress out-put international trading & out-put international transaction, Instrument OBLIGATIONS (97 SHEETS) US$. 97,000,000,000.00 IN THE NAME OF 25 NATIONS & 45 BANK CENTRALS OR ANY OTHER PERSONS-UNODC Reporting For UN-SWISSINDO Executed Project for applicable law in all locations, on behalf Certificated Shares US$.1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00.

RE-MOMENTUM MEANS EVERYTHING

Attention Member's,
Symbol- Tactical Air Defense Services Inc
Current Price: .001
Short Term- .15
Rated - 5 Stars

Man oh man, nothing beats learning about a deep, dark secret that the fat cats won't share with you - am I right? Our crack due diligence team has uncovered one small company with Top Gun Management that you should place in your crosshairs ASAP. Stop what you are doing right now and place TADF on your radar watch list immediately!

Bellwether defense stocks have trounced the S&P 500 for 27 years. And regardless of the fear mongering your hear from the talking heads on financial cable networks about financial meltdowns, European debt issues, or a US economic slowdown; it's a sure bet that in the months and years ahead it won't be any different. This will hold true whether or not the current inhabitant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. has to fill out a change-of-address form after November's election.

Based in Carson City, Nevada, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. ,TADF, offers Tactical Flight Training, Aircraft Maintenance, Air-to-Air Refueling, Aerial Fire-Fighting, and Disaster Relief Services to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. approved Allied Countries, and to other Federal and State Agencies. TADF is certified by the United States Government as a private-sector military contractor and has been granted the all required security clearances.

TADF could be the only investment capable of turning as little as $500 into extraordinary returns. Yet the fact remains that your broker is practically 'forbidden' from recommending this investment to you. Why? Because the Wall Street elite know the reason this investment makes them so much money is because of its exclusivity - and that too much attention might 'water down' their potential 1000% returns. 

The proposed defense budget for the Department of Defense for 2012 is $525.4 billion, up 89% since 2001. And let's not forget the costs of our Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which includes ongoing efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, which are funded separately in the 2012 budget at $88.5 billion, bringing the grand prize total of US defense spending to a whopping $613.9 billion!

TADF has created an unparalleled organization of experienced military and aviation personnel with which to operate its specialty aerial support services business. With access to U.S. military aircraft such as F-16 and F-5 fighter aircraft, and Russian military aircrafts such as ILyushin IL-78 and IL-76 Super-Tankers, Mig-17 fighter aircraft, and Sukhoi SU-27 fighter aircraft, TADF is positioned to rain down profits for earlier investors.

TADF has established itself as a leader in the rapidly growing industry of government outsourcing of aerospace/defense services to the private sector, partnering with defense contractor behemoths like XE, formally the infamous Blackwater private special operations security forces during the Iraq war. 

The value of the company could stand to increase in value by up to ten times its current trading price...generating huge gains for savvy investors! So don't delay, do your research now on TADF. TADF has earned our 5 Star rating as a Strong Speculative BUY.

Principle its all Organization Certificate of the INTERNATIONAL MANDATE AND AUTHORIZATION DEFENSE to act non negoitiable with code order Geneva from 1963: Garuda Indonesia is Married With Nangkuti The King Wali Sakti Is Born Java Singleton-System Kingdom Civil Society by Neo The United Kingdom of God Sky Earth of the Big Five Continent AAE.A2-Asia. Africa. Europe. America. Australia.

EXHIBITS AB
WELCOME TO INDONESIA MERCUSUAR DUNIA
INDONESIA GOVERNMENT
YES OR YESSS!
Grants Gov’t Team
[THREAD ID;1-1TB79N]

12 ISTAINI AGUNG NGESTI TUNGGAL
AUGUST 08, 2012
INTERNATIONAL C.L LEADERSHIP WORLD
F.L.O-FESSELIO LIUZES ORFILIZE K.H.K GROUP-NEO IMMAM MAHDI
PENTAGON ARMADA 7.8.9 GLOBAL IMMUNITY
EXHIBITS AB-RI.1/001/17/5987/969:333/999:333 (36.2)
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING’S AM-1
THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
P1.PKC.NKRI NO.27.999.19

/S/S/MORNING STAR/SPIRITUAL BOY/505/2012

MR.A1.Sino.AS.S”2”.IR.Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.NN
[Neo Consortium International As God of Trust Officer]

BANK OWNERSHIP TYPE & BANKING RELATIONSHIPS


BANK OWNERSHIP TYPE & BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
OVER ALL
GLOBAL IMMUNITY FRN.0831934
IDENTICAL DATA CODE OWNERSHIP BY SINO.AS

UBS-PROMISE PAY SINCE 2002 FOR 2012

US$. 120,000,000,000.00

HISTORY LEGAL BACK GROUND
SPECIAL INDONESIA TRANSACTION C.L.N TRANSACTION INDONESIA 0000023156 RI.I 00001
INA 45 C.F.A 000675645

Capital terms are used in this Note shall have the meaning specified in paragraph 7, below or in orther provisions of this Note.

I, Promise to PAY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, UBS (the “Maker”) company validly existing under Laws of the SWITZERLAND, with Account Authorization White Spiritual Boy its main domicile and offices coordinates bank at BANK OF TOKYO, LTD. (Mistsubishi-UFJ) GENERAL MERGER, and OVERTAKE ORDER RESPONSIBILITY OF BANKS principle The Bank is Responsible: 

This is Certification of International Secret Control Monetary Finance System, Authorization Integrated Responsible For Investment UBS-UNPRI, UN-Principle For responsible Investment to A Single Owner Consortium Internationality The UBS A.G. WORLD BANK. BANK OF INDONESIA by OWNER CENTRAL BANKS by BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A, for keeps international transaction and treaties international agreement of the basis Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008 duly represented by 457785677/BG.

Bank Report : UBS A.G
D.P.T : D-80219884/BG-80403
Subject : Payment Guarantee
Subject : Deposit Control Statement Invest Deposit

BANK :
- UBS A.G Paradeplatz 6, Zurich-Switzerland
- UBS A.G Klausstrasse 4, Zurich-Switzerland

Date : NOVEMBER 12, 2012

INTRUCTION PAYMENT
DEBT PRIVATE & PUBLIC CUSIP:

Instrument OBLIGATIONS

To PAY DEBT PRIVATE AND PUBLIC 
Amount: US$. 97,000,000,000.00
Beneficial Name: Top President Finance AAE.A2 (UN-SWISSINDO)
The Great Commitee of Treaty Event UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL

NOTED: The Payment Costs Bugedting Operational Special Indonesia Transaction. Its on behalf BANK AGREEMENT UBS Bond Program 2012, Terminal Protection-USA under Signatory Guarantee Medallion Program Certificate Code 99.98 series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones). Certificated Shares US$. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00. To the Global Payment & Transfer Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK of amount US$. 920,000,000,000,000,000.00. under Grants Beneficial Name Ownership IR. Sugihartono,ST. Independence A Single Consultant & Contractors.


<This Free NOT Crimes in all locations>

THE GREAT PALACE OF THE WHITE HOUSE BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING'S AM-1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION

The BANK is Responsible of the basis Artcles & Law. 

Bank Ownership Type and Banking Relationships
Allen N. Berger
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 U.S.A.
Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104 U.S.A. 
aberger@frb.gov
Leora F. Klapper
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A. 
lklapper@worldbank.org
Maria Soledad Martinez Peria
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A. 
mmartinezperia@worldbank.org
Rida Zaidi
Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK.
rz213@hermes.cam.ac.uk

CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008/12 of the CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010:: Bank Account Data Sheet SWIFT Code: ASBLPAM12000, ISIN Code: ASBLPAM99900 Euroclear: EUASBLP12000 (List of 1-2).



Background
The law of EVIDENCE governs how parties, judges, and juries offer and then evaluate the various forms of proof at trial. In some ways, evidence is an extension of civil and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Generally, evidence law establishes a group of limitations that courts enforce against attorneys in an attempt to control the various events that the trial process presents in an adversarial setting. There are many arguments in favor of evidence law; here are five of the most common ones:
1. To ameliorate pervasive mistrust of juries
2. To further legal or social policies relating to a matter being litigated
3. To further substantive policies unrelated to the matter in suit
4. To create conditions to receive the most accurate facts in trials
5. To manage the scope and duration of trials
In the United States, the federal courts must follow the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE); state courts generally follow their own rules, which are generally imposed by the various state legislatures upon their respective state courts. The FRE is the most influential body of American evidence law. The FRE encompasses the majority of the laws of evidence in 68 brief sections. Its language is accessible, easy to read, and mostly free of technical jargon and complicated cross-referencing. The FRE has been enormously influential in the development of U. S. evidence law. This influence in part is a result of its brevity and simplicity.
Before 1975, U. S. evidence law was mostly a creature of the COMMON LAW tradition. The FRE was drafted and proposed by a distinguished advisory committee composed of practitioners, judges, and law professors appointed by the United States Supreme Court. Just 20 years after the FRE was adopted in the federal system, almost three-quarters of the states had adopted codes that closely resemble the FRE.
The FRE applies in all federal courts in both criminal and civil cases. Understanding some of the basic provisions of the FRE will enable most people to figure out what is going on at trial, even if there are deviations between the FRE and applicable state laws of evidence.
Admissibility
Evidence comes in four basic forms:
1. Demonstrative evidence
2. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
3. REAL EVIDENCE
4. Testimonial evidence
Some rules of evidence apply to all four types and some rules apply to one or two of them. All of these forms of evidence must be ADMISSIBLE, though, before they can be considered as probative of an issue in a trial.
Basically, if evidence is to be admitted at court, it must be relevant, material, and competent. To be considered relevant, it must have some reasonable tendency to help prove or disprove some fact. It need not make the fact certain, but at least it must tend to increase or decrease the likelihood of some fact. Once admitted as relevant evidence, the finder of fact (judge or jury) will determine the appropriate weight to give a particular piece of evidence. A given piece of evidence is considered material if it is offered to prove a fact that is in dispute in a case. Competent evidence is that evidence that accords with certain traditional notions of reliability. Courts are gradually diminishing the competency rules of evidence by making them issues related to the WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE. 
Real Evidence
Real evidence is a thing. Its existence or characteristics are considered relevant and material to an issue in a trial. It is usually a thing that was directly involved in some event in the case, such as a murder weapon, the personal effects of a victim, or an artifact like a cigarette or lighter belonging to a suspect. Real evidence must be relevant, material, and competent before a judge will permit its use in a trial. The process whereby a lawyer establishes these basic prerequisites (and any additional ones that may apply), is called laying a foundation. In most cases, the relevance and materiality of real evidence are obvious. A lawyer establishes the evidence's competence by showing that it really is what it is supposed to be. Establishing that real or other evidence is what it purports to be is called AUTHENTICATION.
Demonstrative Evidence
Evidence is considered "demonstrative" if it demonstrates or illustrates the TESTIMONY of a witness. It is admissible when it fairly and accurately reflects the witness's testimony and is otherwise unobjectionable. Maps, diagrams of a crime scene, charts and graphs that illustrate profits and losses are examples of demonstrative evidence.
Documentary Evidence
Evidence contained in or on documents can be a form of real evidence. For example, a contract offered to prove the terms it contains is both documentary and real evidence. When a party offers a document into evidence, the party must authenticate it the same way as any other real evidence, either by a witness who can identify the document or by witnesses who can establish a chain of CUSTODY for the document.
When people deal with documentary evidence, it is a good idea to consider these four potential pitfalls:
·    Parol evidence
·    Best evidence
·    Authentication
·    HEARSAY
The parol evidence rule prohibits the admission of certain evidence concerning the terms of a written agreement. Parol evidence is usually considered an issue of substantive law, rather than a pure evidentiary matter.
A party can authenticate documentary evidence in much the same way as it can authenticate other real evidence. Also, some kinds of documents are essentially self-authenticating under the FRE. Some of these are:
·    Acknowledged documents to prove the acknowledgment
·    Certain COMMERCIAL PAPER and related documents
·    Certificates of the custodians of business records
·    Certified copies of public records
·    Newspapers
·    Official documents
·    Periodicals
·    Trade inscriptions
The best evidence rule states that when the contents of a written document are offered in evidence, the court will not accept a copy or other proof of the document's content in place of the original document unless an adequate explanation is offered for the absence of the original. The FRE permits the use of mechanically reproduced documents unless one of the parties has raised a genuine question about the accuracy of the copy or can somehow show that its use would be unfair. Also under the FRE, summaries or compilations of lengthy documents may be received into evidence as long as the other parties have made the originals available for EXAMINATION. 
Testimony
Evidence given in the form of testimony is perhaps the most basic type of evidence. Testimonial evidence consists of what a competent witness at the proceeding in question says in court. Generally, witnesses are competent if they meet four broad requirements:
1. The witnesses must take the oath or a substitute and understand the oath,
2. The witnesses must have personal knowledge about the subject of their testimony.
3. The witnesses must recall what was perceived
4. The witnesses must be able to communicate what they perceived
The courts interpret competency quite liberally, which means that testimony based on the competency of a witness is rarely excluded
If at trial witnesses forgets their testimony, the attorney may help to refresh their memory in four ways:
1. First, the attorney can ask the judge for a recess to allow the witnesses time to calm down or otherwise collect themselves.
2. Second, the attorney can ask the witnesses a LEADING QUESTION to try to refresh their memory.
3. Third, the attorney can attempt to refresh the witness's recollection through a process known as past recollection refreshed. The witnesses must first say that they cannot remember the facts the attorney is trying to elicit from them. Then they must say that the refreshing object might help him them to remember. Almost anything that they says might help them can be used to help refresh their memory such as notes, photographs, an item of clothing, a smell, or some other object of some sort.
4. Fourth, the attorney can offer a writing as a past recollection recorded. The witnesses must first claim that they cannot remember the facts the attorney is trying to elicit from her. Next, the attorney presents the writing or other recording the attorney intended to use for the witness. If the attorney can refresh the witness's memory, they will be allowed to answer the question. If the writing does not refresh their memory, they must then identify the writing as one that they made or saw when hey did remember the fact in question and that they knew then that the writing was accurate.
Leading Questions
A leading question actually suggests an answer or substitutes the words of the questioning attorney for those of the witness. Many leading questions call for answers of either "yes" or "no." But not all questions that call for an answer of "yes" or "no" are leading questions.
Judges have discretion to allow leading questions during the DIRECT EXAMINATION of a witness when the questions have the following traits:
·    Deal with simple background issues
·    Will help to elicit the testimony of a witness who, due to age, incapacity, or limited intelligence, is having difficulty communicating her evidence
·    Are asked of an adverse or hostile witness. Witnesses are considered adverse or hostile when their interests or sympathies may lead them to resist testifying truthfully. In most cases, an adverse party or a witness associated with an adverse party is considered hostile for the purposes of this rule
Questions that call for a narrative answer are more or less the opposite of leading questions. Questions that call for a narrative often produce long speeches that can waste the time of the court and the parties. These kinds of questions are very unpopular with courts and should be avoided.
During CROSS-EXAMINATION, attorneys may only ask about subjects that were raised upon the direct examination of the witness, including CREDIBILITY. If cross-examiners stray into a new topical area, the judge may permit them to do so in the interest of time or efficiency, but harassment of the witness is not permitted under any circumstances.
The Lay Opinion Rule
Witnesses must answer questions in the form of statements of what they saw, heard, felt, tasted, or smelled. Usually they are not permitted to express their opinions or draw conclusions. Under the FRE, a court will permit a person who is not testifying as an expert to TESTIFY in the form of an opinion if the opinion is both rationally based on his perception and helps to explain the witness's testimony. Additionally, a competent layperson may provide opinions on certain subjects that are specifically permitted by rule, STATUTE, or CASE LAW. Some of these are:
·    Another person's identity
·    Another person's sanity
·    Demeanor, mood, or intent
·    Identification of handwriting
·    Intoxication or sobriety
·    Ownership
·    The state of health, sickness, or injury
·    Speed, distance, and size
·    The value of a witness's own property
Opinion testimony is not necessarily objectionable even if such testimony goes to the ultimate issue to be decided in the trial
Extrinsic evidence is evidence other than the answers of the witness whose testimony is being impeached. It may be offered to prove facts relevant to impeaching a witness. In addition to extrinsic evidence, a party may attack the credibility of another witness by attempting to show that the witness is or has:
1. Bias, prejudice, interest in the issue, or corruption
2. Criminal convictions, or other prior bad acts
3. Prior inconsistent statements
4. An untruthful character
There are some limits to questioning a witness about a prior criminal CONVICTION. However, according to the FRE, a witness may generally be questioned about criminal convictions when the crime was punishable by a sentence of more than a year or involved FRAUD or a false statement such as PERJURY. Before people attempt to use such evidence in a trial, they need to understand the limits to this kind of evidence.
The FRE allows questions about prior bad acts of a witness to IMPEACH that witness's credibility where, in the court's discretion, the questions will help get at the truth. Thus, an attorney may ask questions about prior inconsistent statements if the following apply:
·    The questioner has a GOOD FAITH basis for believing that the witness made an inconsistent statement
·    The witness needs to be reminded of the time, place, and circumstances of the prior statement
·    If the statement is written, a copy of the written statement must be provided to the opposing COUNSEL upon request
Another way to impeach the testimony of a witness is to show that the witness has a character of untruthfulness. This departure from the basic rule states a party may not provide evidence of a witness's character to show that the witness acted in conformity with that character trait. The FRE permits evidence to prove a witness has a character of untruthfulness in:
·    Testimony of specific instances of untruthfulness
·    The opinion of another witness concerning the honesty of another witness's character
·    Testimony about the target witness's reputation for truthfulness in the community
It is important to know that a witness whose testimony is used to impeach the truthfulness of another witness may in turn be impeached
Character
Character is a general quality usually attributed to a person. Character cannot be used to show that someone acted on a particular occasion in conformity with a particular character trait. On the other hand, habit can be used that way. A habit is a behavior; it is specific, regular, and consistently repeated. Occasionally, some character traits can be linked with a habit, so the distinction between the two can be hard to make at times.
In civil cases, evidence that a person has a character trait generally cannot be used to prove that the person acted in conformity with that character trait on a particular occasion. Evidence of character may be proved where it is an integral issue in a dispute or where a party puts character in issue. Evidence of character is used frequently in criminal trials during the sentencing stage to show that a convicted DEFENDANT merits a lesser or greater sentence or other PENALTY.
Hearsay
The rule against hearsay is deceptively simple and full of exceptions. Hearsay is an out of court statement, made in court, to prove the truth of the matter asserted. In other words, hearsay is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the HEARING in question and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated. For example, Witness A in a murder trial claimed on the stand: "Witness B (the "declarant") told me that the defendant killed the victim." The definition of hearsay is not too difficult to understand. But the matter can become very confusing when one considers all of the many exceptions to the general rule against hearsay.
Even if a statement meets the requirements for hearsay, the statement may yet be admissible under one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. The FRE contains nearly thirty of these exceptions. Most of them are generally available, although a few of them are limited to times when the declarant is unavailable.
There are twenty-four exceptions in the federal rules that do not require proof that the person who made the statement is unavailable. These are:
1. Business records, including those of a public agency
2. Certain public records and reports
3. Evidence of a judgment of conviction for certain purposes
4. Evidence of the absence of a business record or entry
5. Excited utterances or spontaneous statements
6. Family records concerning family history
7. Judgments of a court concerning personal history, family history, general history, or BOUNDARIES, where those matters were essential to the judgment
8. Learned treatises used to question an expert witness
9. Market reports, commercial publications, and the like
10.        Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates
11.        Past recollections recorded
12.        Recorded documents purporting to affect interests in land
13.        Records of religious organizations concerning personal or family history
14.        Records of vital statistics
15.        Reputation concerning boundaries or general history
16.        Reputation concerning family history
17.        Reputation of a person's character
18.        Statements about the declarant's present sense impressions
19.        Statements about the declarant's then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition
20.        Statements in authentic ancient documents (at least 20 years old)
21.        Statements in other documents purporting to affect interests in land and relevant to the purpose of the document
22.        Statements made by the declarant for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment
23.        Statements of the absence of a public record or entry
24.        The "catchall" rule
The last exception, the so-called "catchall" rule, bears some explanation. This rule does not require that the declarant be unavailable to testify. It does say that evidence of a hearsay statement not included in one of the other exceptions may nevertheless be admitted if it meets these following conditions:
·    It has sound guarantees of trustworthiness
·    It is offered to help prove a material fact
·    It is more probative than other equivalent and reasonably obtainable evidence
·    Its admission would forward the cause of justice
·    The other parties have been notified that it will be offered into evidence
Privileges
In general terms, privileges are rights held by individuals that permit them to refuse to provide evidence or to prevent certain evidence from being offered against them. Privileges exist only to serve specific interests and relationships; courts give them narrow scope.
Privileges are more or less disfavored by the courts because they run contrary to the principle that all relevant evidence should be admitted in a search for truth. Accordingly, the persons or entities whose confidentiality they are meant to shield or protect can waive their privileges. Individuals who possess a privilege are known as "holders" of the privilege. Often, the nonholder who is a party to a privileged communication must assert the privilege on behalf of the holder.
Congress could not agree on how to make laws regarding privileges, so this area was left up to the courts and to state law to define. Thus, under the FRE, when a party offers evidence on a federal claim the applicable privileges are determined by the federal case law. When a party offers evidence on a state claim, the state's law of privilege applies. The federal law of privilege is still developing, and the federal courts are usually less tolerant of parties' claims to privileges than are state courts.
Presumptions
Previously, there was a good deal of controversy among legal professionals and scholars over the effect of presumptions, but these have largely ended, at least in the federal system. Presumptions are just that, a presumption that certain evidence is what it is on its face. Sometimes, however, a presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. There are two kinds of rebuttable presumptions: those that affect the burden of producing evidence and those that affect the burden of proof. In most cases, courts interpret presumptions as rebuttable. A list of rebuttable presumptions includes the following:
·    That a letter that has been correctly addressed and properly mailed is received by the addressee in the ordinary course of the mail
·    That a person who possesses a thing is also the owner of that thing
·    That a writing is dated accurately
·    That a written obligation that has been surrendered to the DEBTOR has been paid by the debtor (and vice versa)
·    That some specific ancient documents are authentic
·    That statements in the records of a process server are true
·    That when a receipt for a payment on an INSTALLMENT debt is given, the debtor has paid all previous installment payments
·    That the defendant was negligent when the requirements of res ipsa loquitur have been proven
·    The presumptions that money or property delivered is in fact owed to the recipient
A presumption is not considered evidence. But if an opponent to a presumption puts on no evidence to rebut the presumption, the judge or jury must assume the existence of the presumed fact. On the other hand, if an opponent to a presumption does provide evidence to rebut the presumption, the presumption has no further effect.
Judicial Notice
Sometimes, the need for evidence on an issue in a case can be satisfied through formal admissions, stipulations, and judicial notice. Likewise, under the FRE, a judge may take judicial notice of facts that are not in issue because they are either generally known (e.g. George Washington was the first president of the United States), or they can be accurately and readily determined (e.g. the exact time of sunrise on a particular day). In addition, state and federal courts can take judicial notice of the laws of the states and of the federal system.
Additional Resources
An Introduction to the Law of Evidence. Lilly, Graham C., West Wadsworth, 1996.
Evidence 2nd ed., Mueller, Christopher B., and Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1999.
Federal Evidence 4th ed., Weissenberger, Glen, and James J. Duane. Anderson Publishing Company, 2001.
"Federal Rules of Evidence." Legal Information Institute, 2002. Available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/overview.html. Legal Information Institute, 2002.
Federal Rules of Evidence in a Nutshell, 5th Ed. 5th ed., Graham, Michael H., West Publishing, 2001.
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values. Leonard, David P., and Richard D. Friedman, editors., Aspen Law & Business, 2002.
Trial Evidence, Second Edition. 2nd ed., Mauet, Thomas A., and Warren D. Wolfson. Aspen Law & Business, 2001.
Organizations
Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar Association (ABA)
740 15th Street, NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-1009 USA
Phone:
  (202) 662-1500 
Fax: (202) 662-1501
 
URL:
 http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/home.html
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 901
Washington, DC 20036 USA
Phone:
  (202) 872-8600 
Fax: (202) 872-8690
 
E-Mail: assist@n acdl.org
 
URL:
 www.nacdl.org
National District Attorneys Association
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510
Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
Phone:
  (703) 549-9222
Fax: (703) 836-3195
 
URL:
 http://www.ndaa.org/index.html
Source: Encyclopedia of Everyday Law, ©2003 Gale Cengage. All Rights Reserved.Full copyright.