Jumat, 16 November 2012
Minggu, 04 November 2012
HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECT
PENGENALAN DINI
HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECT
Material InI Lisensi Patent Hukum Perjanjian
SECRET CONTROL MONETARY FINANCE SYSTEM
EXHIBITS AB
HUMAN OBLIGATION
PENGENALAN DINI DAN WINATA LAKSANA
DIMENSIA OBLIGASI MANUSIA
DI LIMA BENUA (193) NEGARA
DARMA IBU PERTIWI
KEADILAN SOSIAL BAGI SELURUH RAKYAT INDONESIA
DAN
MERCUSUAR DUNIA
TULANG PUNGGUNG DAN TULANG RUSUK K.A.R NEGARA
ISIM A1 & B2
STNA 369
GANEFO+OOO+O1 UN-SWISSINDO
INA: 117.113.112-ITJ
PROGRAM
INVESTMENT-ASSET-BANKING SYSTEM
NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF 300-THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIC AGENCT
UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
(PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA)
OLEH:
CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONALITY
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
BADAN INDUK LEMBAGA TINGGI TERTINGGI NEGARA [AAE.A2] SEMESTA ALAM
OWNER:
UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM
PENDAHULUAN
LATAR BELAKANG
PENELUSURAN MASALAH
ASAL –USUL SEJARAH
POKOK PERSOALAN GLOBAL
ADAT BUDAYA DAN AGAMA
POKOK PERSOALAN
PERSONAL
ASSET
BANGKING SYSTEM
PROGRAM HUMAN OBLIGATION
JAMINAN BIAYA HIDUP UMAT SEDUNIA
PER-KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK DUNIA-INDONESIA
BANK-BANK PELAKSANA
DI LIMA BENUA (193) NEGARA
DARMA IBU PERTIWI
KEADILAN SOSIAL BAGI SELURUH RAKYAT INDONESIA
DAN
MERCUSUAR DUNIA
TULANG PUNGGUNG DAN TULANG RUSUK K.A.R NEGARA
ISIM A1 & B2
STNA 369
GANEFO+OOO+O1 UN-SWISSINDO
INA: 117.113.112-ITJ
PROGRAM
INVESTMENT-ASSET-BANKING SYSTEM
NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF 300-THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIC AGENCT
UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
(PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA)
OLEH:
CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONALITY
SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT
BADAN INDUK LEMBAGA TINGGI TERTINGGI NEGARA [AAE.A2] SEMESTA ALAM
OWNER:
UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM
PENDAHULUAN
LATAR BELAKANG
PENELUSURAN MASALAH
ASAL –USUL SEJARAH
POKOK PERSOALAN GLOBAL
ADAT BUDAYA DAN AGAMA
POKOK PERSOALAN
PERSONAL
ASSET
BANGKING SYSTEM
PROGRAM HUMAN OBLIGATION
JAMINAN BIAYA HIDUP UMAT SEDUNIA
PER-KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK DUNIA-INDONESIA
BANK-BANK PELAKSANA
1.NASIONAL INDONESIA
2.INTERNASIONAL NEGARA ANGGOTA PBB-5 BENUA
DILAKSANAKAN DARI TINGKAT DESA
DIKETUAI KEPALA DESA/KONSULTAN TINGKAT DESA
KOORDINATOR TINGKAT RW/RT
FUNGSI HUMAN OBLIGATION-OBLIGASI MANUSIA
BERDASAR PROPOSAL
JAMINAN OTOMATIS PER-BULAN
SELAKU ALAT BAYAR
BERLAKU DALAM BENTUK ATM-U/KTP-ELEKTRONIK
MASA BERLAKU
TIDAK BISA DIWARISKAN
STATUS HUKUM KEYNESS DAN ONGKO WIJOYO
"ESTWO ATM-U SENILAI JAMINAN CETAK STANDAR SAH BAYAR MATA UANG DUNIA"
SINGLE TRANSACTION
"PRICE ORDER LEGAL TENDER"
ESTWO CLEAR MATA UANG TUNGGAL DUNIA
BERBENTUK CURRENCY CARD ELEKTRONIK
CERTIFY OF CASH MONEY
GARANSI PEMBAYARAN NO. 1872498092-UBS
UNTUK PEMBAYARAN DEBT PRIVATE & PUBLIK
WORLD BANK NOTES
DIKELUARKAN OLEH:
PUSAT BANK DUNIA RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A
DIDISTRIBUSIKAN OLEH:
COORDINATES BANK: BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ.LTD
TYPE CASH MONEY
BERBENTUK CARD ESTWO
PENERIMA SELURUH RAKYAT INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE PEMILIK KTP/SSN, MINIMAL UMUR 17 TAHUN.
GARANSI TRANSAKSI
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
SPIRITUAL BOY DI:
INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE
DI ENAM (96) PRIME BANK
1. BNI.
2. BCA.
3. BRI.
4. DANAMON.
5. MANDIRI.
6. LIPPO BANK GROUP (CIMB-NIAGA).
GARANSI INTERNASIONAL
DEPOSIT CONTROL STATEMENT INVEST DEPOSIT
ORDER: PERSONAL ONLY
GARANSI ASSET JAMINAN HIDUP UMAT SEDUNIA:
1. Exhibit Gold Certificate UBS No.001-No.235 dan Holder Certificate UBS Total: 74.760.920.184 KGs.
2. Account Code Asset & Account Code Funds-SUPER SEMMAR
Exhibit A-11 dan Exhibit B-11.
3. Account Data Sheets Audit akhir TGL. 01 Desember, 2008/2012.
4. Seri-Seri Asset 01-4 meliputi Register Induk Tanah-Tanah
Eigendom Perponding (Pembayar Pajak, Hak Sewa, Hak Guna):
* Pertambangan
* Perkebunan
* Pertanian
* Perhubungan (darat-laut-udara).
5. Warehouse AN.ACT.147, 1903 Meliputi:
Warehouse 77, Cakra 55 dan G.7.
6. Sertifikat Induk 25 Negara-INDONESIA.
MATA UANG TUNGGAL DUNIA
Adalah:
LISENSI PATENT PERJANJIAN SWISSINDO
Kesatuan Kepamilikan SECRET ORGANIZATION UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL, Badan Induk Bank:
* WORLD BANK
* UBS A.G
* BANK INDONESIA
$ FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
OWNER ACTUAL GENUINE CURRENCY PAPER-MONEY WORLD (GOLD & SILVER COINS), ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL FOR THE TREASURY TAX & LOAN PROGRAM (31 CFR 203).
12-12/2012 DECONTRUCTION
PERUBAHAN DAN PENGGUNAAN MATA UANG KERTAS (gOLD & sILVER cOINS) STANDAR SAH BAYAR MATA UANG DUNIA, KEDALAM OTORITA VETO: SEALED REGISTERED WORLD PROGRAM MEDALLIO HELPING ONE HUNDRED YEARS TO CREATE THE FUTURE
ON USING
INTEGRATED GLOBAL PAYMENT
OTORITA PERJANJIAN BANK NASIONAL INTERNASIONAL
WORLD BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM NOTES SERIAL 12.12.2012.
CARD CURRENCY ESTWO (ATM-U) ELEKTRONIK, ALAT BAYAR HUMAN OBLIGATIONS DISELURUH DUNIA ALAM SAPU JAGAD PAMUNGKAS CAKRA BUWANA, SERI ON SESUAI NOMOR-NOMOR KTP/SSN BERNILAI COLLATERAL DAN CASH COLLATERAL, MASING-MASING PEMEGANG KARTU TANDA PENDUDUK DUNIA, INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE, SENILAI ESTWO CURRENCY CARD IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM "KEYNESS LAW" DALAM SYMBOL N$2. DALAM DESAIN SERI 1928/2012 US$.1.000.000. FIXED RATE= N$2.1 / US$. 225.
SALAKU COLLATERAL & CASH COLLATERAL CARD SETARA DENGAN N$2.225.000.000 NILAI MASING-MASING KTP/SSN SESUAI NO. REGISTER KTP/SSN DISELURUH DUNIA.
HAK PENGGUNAAN PER-KTP/SSN
SENILAI US$. 6.000.000
HAK OTOMATIS JAMINAN BIAYA HIDUP MANUSIA DIDUNIA SENILAI: US$. 600.
FIXED RATE US$.1 / Rp.9.200
DILAKSANAKAN OLEH RAKYAT INDONESIA & TIMOR LESTE (193 NEGARA) SESUAI:
1. PROGRAM INTEGRASI PEMBAYARAN GLOBAL.
2. PROGRAM REKRUTMENT TENAGA KERJA /S.D.M
DEPARTMENT PEMERINTAH GLOBAL ," DEPARTMENT WORLD
RESOURCE OF POPULATIONS.
3. SERTIFIKASI KONTRAK-KONTRAK PEMBAYARAN EXHIBITS AB.
4. PROGRAM-PROGRAM KATALOG BANK DUNIA.
5. SILA KE V.
6. PASAL 1 AYAT 1, PASAL 32, PASAL 33 AYAT 3.
7. FATF-GAFI RECOMMENDATION 1-IX (40+9)
ANTI MONEY LOUNDERING, DRUG & TERORISM.
8. COUNTERFEIGHTING PARTY & COUNTERFEIGHTING
COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, VIENA 1934.
9. GLOBAL IMMUNITY FRN. 0831934.
10. REGULATIONS E-BIS.
11. FINAL RULE ASBLP-0333902-2010.
12. GRANT'S GOV'T TEAM-FED.USA.
13. ABSOLUTE TITLE.
GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
Sino.AS Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.
(President Besar PBB-UN-SWISSINDO)
Dan:
Ban Ki Moon ( Sec.Gend-UN-SWISSINDO)
Patricia O’Brien (Legal Affair-UN-SWISSINDO)
Achim Steiner (Executive Director UNEP-SWISSINDO)
Hal tersebut diatas adalah bagian TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO, Bersama Jawaban dan Tantangan Dunia, Alfa Omega 0102.
PENGAMANAN
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
(NATO-SEATO-NON BLOCK)
Konsultan & Kontraktor Tunggal.
UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
CODE: 062.119.153
UNITED NATIONS
AUTHORIZATION DEFENSE
THE POLICE MAN OF MILITARY
CERTIFICATE EXCELLENCE ON EXECUTION
MULTINATIONAL IN OPERATION
AL BISRAIDER AC.USP.P.1568-1120 BANK OFFICER 8040, SWITZERLAND-INDONESIA
SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS SWIFT 80A OCHZZ COORDINATES BANK, ZURICH-CUREBON
CODE INA: 117.113.112.ITJ
**************
MORNING STAR THE SPIRITUAL WONDER BOY
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) and (TADF) Tactical Air Defense Services
AUTHENTICITY OF CERTIFICATE
(12 CFR 4)
Under Crown Council 13-Dewan Ikatan Document of International Certificate Code 99.98 Series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones) International Mandate The Great President of the United Nation Organization Final Rule ASBLP-0333902-2010 (The International Commottee of 300-The International Organic Agency-United Nation Organization) by F.L.O Big Top Royal, K.681 The Master Key Indonesia King of King’s AM-I from Nationals and Republic of Indonesia ownership NKRI 17-8-1945 The Founding Father’s Regional International Institutions of the SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT code W3C-International Court of Justice INA: 117.113.112.ITJ.
UBS UNPRI, UN-Principle For Responsibility Investment of Nations and IPO-Investment one on part Investment Regulations S Rule 903 or 904-SEC Regulations. Investment Lending Portfolio, Investment Lending Law, Aplicable Law completed counterfeiting party and counterfeiting comptroller of the currency BA1 (Official 1, Exhibit A) (9/97), JOINT RESOLUTION J.R.98 OF SECTION 3A101 TITLE 31, H.R. 1249, United State Code Grants Gov’t Team (THREAD ID;1-1TB79N) and TICKET UBS 1319126, Registered BIGDATA Summit BIGD10E.
It’s all full coverage Exhibit A Instruction and Exhibit B Mortgage Statement for finishing PETITION overtake order Responsibility of Nation and peoples. OMB-Office Management Budget For Keeps International Transaction and Treaties International Agrement for this mission using Form ANNEX A3 Publication ICC-458 Completed Number Account Authorizations.
S.O.E-Special Operation Executive by Multinational in Operation with Bugedting Value of Amount US$. 3 ,000,000,000,000.00 with progress out-put international trading & out-put international transaction, Instrument OBLIGATIONS (97 SHEETS) US$. 97,000,000,000.00 IN THE NAME OF 25 NATIONS & 45 BANK CENTRALS OR ANY OTHER PERSONS-UNODC Reporting For UN-SWISSINDO Executed Project for applicable law in all locations, on behalf Certificated Shares US$.1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00.
RE-MOMENTUM MEANS EVERYTHING
Attention Member's,
Symbol- Tactical Air Defense Services Inc
Current Price: .001
Short Term- .15
Rated - 5 Stars
Man oh man, nothing beats learning about a deep, dark secret that the fat cats won't share with you - am I right? Our crack due diligence team has uncovered one small company with Top Gun Management that you should place in your crosshairs ASAP. Stop what you are doing right now and place TADF on your radar watch list immediately!
Bellwether defense stocks have trounced the S&P 500 for 27 years. And regardless of the fear mongering your hear from the talking heads on financial cable networks about financial meltdowns, European debt issues, or a US economic slowdown; it's a sure bet that in the months and years ahead it won't be any different. This will hold true whether or not the current inhabitant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. has to fill out a change-of-address form after November's election.
Based in Carson City, Nevada, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. ,TADF, offers Tactical Flight Training, Aircraft Maintenance, Air-to-Air Refueling, Aerial Fire-Fighting, and Disaster Relief Services to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. approved Allied Countries, and to other Federal and State Agencies. TADF is certified by the United States Government as a private-sector military contractor and has been granted the all required security clearances.
TADF could be the only investment capable of turning as little as $500 into extraordinary returns. Yet the fact remains that your broker is practically 'forbidden' from recommending this investment to you. Why? Because the Wall Street elite know the reason this investment makes them so much money is because of its exclusivity - and that too much attention might 'water down' their potential 1000% returns.
The proposed defense budget for the Department of Defense for 2012 is $525.4 billion, up 89% since 2001. And let's not forget the costs of our Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which includes ongoing efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, which are funded separately in the 2012 budget at $88.5 billion, bringing the grand prize total of US defense spending to a whopping $613.9 billion!
TADF has created an unparalleled organization of experienced military and aviation personnel with which to operate its specialty aerial support services business. With access to U.S. military aircraft such as F-16 and F-5 fighter aircraft, and Russian military aircrafts such as ILyushin IL-78 and IL-76 Super-Tankers, Mig-17 fighter aircraft, and Sukhoi SU-27 fighter aircraft, TADF is positioned to rain down profits for earlier investors.
TADF has established itself as a leader in the rapidly growing industry of government outsourcing of aerospace/defense services to the private sector, partnering with defense contractor behemoths like XE, formally the infamous Blackwater private special operations security forces during the Iraq war.
The value of the company could stand to increase in value by up to ten times its current trading price...generating huge gains for savvy investors! So don't delay, do your research now on TADF. TADF has earned our 5 Star rating as a Strong Speculative BUY.
Principle its all Organization Certificate of the INTERNATIONAL MANDATE AND AUTHORIZATION DEFENSE to act non negoitiable with code order Geneva from 1963: Garuda Indonesia is Married With Nangkuti The King Wali Sakti Is Born Java Singleton-System Kingdom Civil Society by Neo The United Kingdom of God Sky Earth of the Big Five Continent AAE.A2-Asia. Africa. Europe. America. Australia.
EXHIBITS AB
WELCOME TO INDONESIA MERCUSUAR DUNIA
INDONESIA GOVERNMENT
YES OR YESSS!
Grants Gov’t Team
[THREAD ID;1-1TB79N]
12 ISTAINI AGUNG NGESTI TUNGGAL
AUGUST 08, 2012
INTERNATIONAL C.L LEADERSHIP WORLD
F.L.O-FESSELIO LIUZES ORFILIZE K.H.K GROUP-NEO IMMAM MAHDI
PENTAGON ARMADA 7.8.9 GLOBAL IMMUNITY
EXHIBITS AB-RI.1/001/17/5987/969:333/999:333 (36.2)
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING’S AM-1
THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
P1.PKC.NKRI NO.27.999.19
/S/S/MORNING STAR/SPIRITUAL BOY/505/2012
MR.A1.Sino.AS.S”2”.IR.Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.NN
[Neo Consortium International As God of Trust Officer]
THE POLICE MAN OF MILITARY
CERTIFICATE EXCELLENCE ON EXECUTION
MULTINATIONAL IN OPERATION
AL BISRAIDER AC.USP.P.1568-1120 BANK OFFICER 8040, SWITZERLAND-INDONESIA
SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS SWIFT 80A OCHZZ COORDINATES BANK, ZURICH-CUREBON
CODE INA: 117.113.112.ITJ
**************
MORNING STAR THE SPIRITUAL WONDER BOY
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) and (TADF) Tactical Air Defense Services
AUTHENTICITY OF CERTIFICATE
(12 CFR 4)
Under Crown Council 13-Dewan Ikatan Document of International Certificate Code 99.98 Series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones) International Mandate The Great President of the United Nation Organization Final Rule ASBLP-0333902-2010 (The International Commottee of 300-The International Organic Agency-United Nation Organization) by F.L.O Big Top Royal, K.681 The Master Key Indonesia King of King’s AM-I from Nationals and Republic of Indonesia ownership NKRI 17-8-1945 The Founding Father’s Regional International Institutions of the SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT code W3C-International Court of Justice INA: 117.113.112.ITJ.
UBS UNPRI, UN-Principle For Responsibility Investment of Nations and IPO-Investment one on part Investment Regulations S Rule 903 or 904-SEC Regulations. Investment Lending Portfolio, Investment Lending Law, Aplicable Law completed counterfeiting party and counterfeiting comptroller of the currency BA1 (Official 1, Exhibit A) (9/97), JOINT RESOLUTION J.R.98 OF SECTION 3A101 TITLE 31, H.R. 1249, United State Code Grants Gov’t Team (THREAD ID;1-1TB79N) and TICKET UBS 1319126, Registered BIGDATA Summit BIGD10E.
It’s all full coverage Exhibit A Instruction and Exhibit B Mortgage Statement for finishing PETITION overtake order Responsibility of Nation and peoples. OMB-Office Management Budget For Keeps International Transaction and Treaties International Agrement for this mission using Form ANNEX A3 Publication ICC-458 Completed Number Account Authorizations.
S.O.E-Special Operation Executive by Multinational in Operation with Bugedting Value of Amount US$. 3 ,000,000,000,000.00 with progress out-put international trading & out-put international transaction, Instrument OBLIGATIONS (97 SHEETS) US$. 97,000,000,000.00 IN THE NAME OF 25 NATIONS & 45 BANK CENTRALS OR ANY OTHER PERSONS-UNODC Reporting For UN-SWISSINDO Executed Project for applicable law in all locations, on behalf Certificated Shares US$.1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00.
RE-MOMENTUM MEANS EVERYTHING
Attention Member's,
Symbol- Tactical Air Defense Services Inc
Current Price: .001
Short Term- .15
Rated - 5 Stars
Man oh man, nothing beats learning about a deep, dark secret that the fat cats won't share with you - am I right? Our crack due diligence team has uncovered one small company with Top Gun Management that you should place in your crosshairs ASAP. Stop what you are doing right now and place TADF on your radar watch list immediately!
Bellwether defense stocks have trounced the S&P 500 for 27 years. And regardless of the fear mongering your hear from the talking heads on financial cable networks about financial meltdowns, European debt issues, or a US economic slowdown; it's a sure bet that in the months and years ahead it won't be any different. This will hold true whether or not the current inhabitant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. has to fill out a change-of-address form after November's election.
Based in Carson City, Nevada, Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. ,TADF, offers Tactical Flight Training, Aircraft Maintenance, Air-to-Air Refueling, Aerial Fire-Fighting, and Disaster Relief Services to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. approved Allied Countries, and to other Federal and State Agencies. TADF is certified by the United States Government as a private-sector military contractor and has been granted the all required security clearances.
TADF could be the only investment capable of turning as little as $500 into extraordinary returns. Yet the fact remains that your broker is practically 'forbidden' from recommending this investment to you. Why? Because the Wall Street elite know the reason this investment makes them so much money is because of its exclusivity - and that too much attention might 'water down' their potential 1000% returns.
The proposed defense budget for the Department of Defense for 2012 is $525.4 billion, up 89% since 2001. And let's not forget the costs of our Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which includes ongoing efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, which are funded separately in the 2012 budget at $88.5 billion, bringing the grand prize total of US defense spending to a whopping $613.9 billion!
TADF has created an unparalleled organization of experienced military and aviation personnel with which to operate its specialty aerial support services business. With access to U.S. military aircraft such as F-16 and F-5 fighter aircraft, and Russian military aircrafts such as ILyushin IL-78 and IL-76 Super-Tankers, Mig-17 fighter aircraft, and Sukhoi SU-27 fighter aircraft, TADF is positioned to rain down profits for earlier investors.
TADF has established itself as a leader in the rapidly growing industry of government outsourcing of aerospace/defense services to the private sector, partnering with defense contractor behemoths like XE, formally the infamous Blackwater private special operations security forces during the Iraq war.
The value of the company could stand to increase in value by up to ten times its current trading price...generating huge gains for savvy investors! So don't delay, do your research now on TADF. TADF has earned our 5 Star rating as a Strong Speculative BUY.
Principle its all Organization Certificate of the INTERNATIONAL MANDATE AND AUTHORIZATION DEFENSE to act non negoitiable with code order Geneva from 1963: Garuda Indonesia is Married With Nangkuti The King Wali Sakti Is Born Java Singleton-System Kingdom Civil Society by Neo The United Kingdom of God Sky Earth of the Big Five Continent AAE.A2-Asia. Africa. Europe. America. Australia.
EXHIBITS AB
WELCOME TO INDONESIA MERCUSUAR DUNIA
INDONESIA GOVERNMENT
YES OR YESSS!
Grants Gov’t Team
[THREAD ID;1-1TB79N]
12 ISTAINI AGUNG NGESTI TUNGGAL
AUGUST 08, 2012
INTERNATIONAL C.L LEADERSHIP WORLD
F.L.O-FESSELIO LIUZES ORFILIZE K.H.K GROUP-NEO IMMAM MAHDI
PENTAGON ARMADA 7.8.9 GLOBAL IMMUNITY
EXHIBITS AB-RI.1/001/17/5987/969:333/999:333 (36.2)
SPECIAL FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING’S AM-1
THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
P1.PKC.NKRI NO.27.999.19
/S/S/MORNING STAR/SPIRITUAL BOY/505/2012
MR.A1.Sino.AS.S”2”.IR.Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.NN
[Neo Consortium International As God of Trust Officer]
BANK OWNERSHIP TYPE & BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
BANK OWNERSHIP TYPE & BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
OVER ALL
GLOBAL IMMUNITY FRN.0831934
IDENTICAL DATA CODE OWNERSHIP BY SINO.AS
UBS-PROMISE PAY SINCE 2002 FOR 2012
US$. 120,000,000,000.00
HISTORY LEGAL BACK GROUND
SPECIAL INDONESIA TRANSACTION C.L.N TRANSACTION INDONESIA 0000023156 RI.I 00001
INA 45 C.F.A 000675645
Capital terms are used in this Note shall have the meaning specified in paragraph 7, below or in orther provisions of this Note.
I, Promise to PAY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, UBS (the “Maker”) company validly existing under Laws of the SWITZERLAND, with Account Authorization White Spiritual Boy its main domicile and offices coordinates bank at BANK OF TOKYO, LTD. (Mistsubishi-UFJ) GENERAL MERGER, and OVERTAKE ORDER RESPONSIBILITY OF BANKS principle The Bank is Responsible:
This is Certification of International Secret Control Monetary Finance System, Authorization Integrated Responsible For Investment UBS-UNPRI, UN-Principle For responsible Investment to A Single Owner Consortium Internationality The UBS A.G. WORLD BANK. BANK OF INDONESIA by OWNER CENTRAL BANKS by BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A, for keeps international transaction and treaties international agreement of the basis Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008 duly represented by 457785677/BG.
Bank Report : UBS A.G
D.P.T : D-80219884/BG-80403
Subject : Payment Guarantee
Subject : Deposit Control Statement Invest Deposit
BANK :
- UBS A.G Paradeplatz 6, Zurich-Switzerland
- UBS A.G Klausstrasse 4, Zurich-Switzerland
Date : NOVEMBER 12, 2012
INTRUCTION PAYMENT
DEBT PRIVATE & PUBLIC CUSIP:
Instrument OBLIGATIONS
To PAY DEBT PRIVATE AND PUBLIC
Amount: US$. 97,000,000,000.00
Beneficial Name: Top President Finance AAE.A2 (UN-SWISSINDO)
The Great Commitee of Treaty Event UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
NOTED: The Payment Costs Bugedting Operational Special Indonesia Transaction. Its on behalf BANK AGREEMENT UBS Bond Program 2012, Terminal Protection-USA under Signatory Guarantee Medallion Program Certificate Code 99.98 series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones). Certificated Shares US$. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00. To the Global Payment & Transfer Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK of amount US$. 920,000,000,000,000,000.00. under Grants Beneficial Name Ownership IR. Sugihartono,ST. Independence A Single Consultant & Contractors.
<This Free NOT Crimes in all locations>
THE GREAT PALACE OF THE WHITE HOUSE BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING'S AM-1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
The BANK is Responsible of the basis Artcles & Law.
Bank Ownership Type and Banking Relationships
Allen N. Berger
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 U.S.A.
Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104 U.S.A.
aberger@frb.gov
Leora F. Klapper
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A.
lklapper@worldbank.org
Maria Soledad Martinez Peria
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A.
mmartinezperia@worldbank.org
Rida Zaidi
Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK.
rz213@hermes.cam.ac.uk
CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008/12 of the CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010:: Bank Account Data Sheet SWIFT Code: ASBLPAM12000, ISIN Code: ASBLPAM99900 Euroclear: EUASBLP12000 (List of 1-2).
OVER ALL
GLOBAL IMMUNITY FRN.0831934
IDENTICAL DATA CODE OWNERSHIP BY SINO.AS
UBS-PROMISE PAY SINCE 2002 FOR 2012
US$. 120,000,000,000.00
HISTORY LEGAL BACK GROUND
SPECIAL INDONESIA TRANSACTION C.L.N TRANSACTION INDONESIA 0000023156 RI.I 00001
INA 45 C.F.A 000675645
Capital terms are used in this Note shall have the meaning specified in paragraph 7, below or in orther provisions of this Note.
I, Promise to PAY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, UBS (the “Maker”) company validly existing under Laws of the SWITZERLAND, with Account Authorization White Spiritual Boy its main domicile and offices coordinates bank at BANK OF TOKYO, LTD. (Mistsubishi-UFJ) GENERAL MERGER, and OVERTAKE ORDER RESPONSIBILITY OF BANKS principle The Bank is Responsible:
This is Certification of International Secret Control Monetary Finance System, Authorization Integrated Responsible For Investment UBS-UNPRI, UN-Principle For responsible Investment to A Single Owner Consortium Internationality The UBS A.G. WORLD BANK. BANK OF INDONESIA by OWNER CENTRAL BANKS by BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A, for keeps international transaction and treaties international agreement of the basis Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008 duly represented by 457785677/BG.
Bank Report : UBS A.G
D.P.T : D-80219884/BG-80403
Subject : Payment Guarantee
Subject : Deposit Control Statement Invest Deposit
BANK :
- UBS A.G Paradeplatz 6, Zurich-Switzerland
- UBS A.G Klausstrasse 4, Zurich-Switzerland
Date : NOVEMBER 12, 2012
INTRUCTION PAYMENT
DEBT PRIVATE & PUBLIC CUSIP:
Instrument OBLIGATIONS
To PAY DEBT PRIVATE AND PUBLIC
Amount: US$. 97,000,000,000.00
Beneficial Name: Top President Finance AAE.A2 (UN-SWISSINDO)
The Great Commitee of Treaty Event UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL
NOTED: The Payment Costs Bugedting Operational Special Indonesia Transaction. Its on behalf BANK AGREEMENT UBS Bond Program 2012, Terminal Protection-USA under Signatory Guarantee Medallion Program Certificate Code 99.98 series 01-4 Asset UBS History (Milestones). Certificated Shares US$. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00. To the Global Payment & Transfer Clearance Program UBS. WORLD BANK of amount US$. 920,000,000,000,000,000.00. under Grants Beneficial Name Ownership IR. Sugihartono,ST. Independence A Single Consultant & Contractors.
<This Free NOT Crimes in all locations>
THE GREAT PALACE OF THE WHITE HOUSE BIG TOP ROYAL, K.681 KING OF KING'S AM-1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GREAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION
The BANK is Responsible of the basis Artcles & Law.
Bank Ownership Type and Banking Relationships
Allen N. Berger
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 U.S.A.
Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104 U.S.A.
aberger@frb.gov
Leora F. Klapper
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A.
lklapper@worldbank.org
Maria Soledad Martinez Peria
Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 U.S.A.
mmartinezperia@worldbank.org
Rida Zaidi
Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK.
rz213@hermes.cam.ac.uk
CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BI-STATE PROGRAM 2008/12 of the CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010:: Bank Account Data Sheet SWIFT Code: ASBLPAM12000, ISIN Code: ASBLPAM99900 Euroclear: EUASBLP12000 (List of 1-2).
Background
The law of EVIDENCE governs how parties, judges, and juries offer and then
evaluate the various forms of proof at trial. In some ways, evidence is an
extension of civil and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Generally, evidence law
establishes a group of limitations that courts enforce against attorneys in an
attempt to control the various events that the trial process presents in an
adversarial setting. There are many arguments in favor of evidence law; here
are five of the most common ones:
1. To ameliorate pervasive mistrust of
juries
2. To further legal or social policies
relating to a matter being litigated
3. To further substantive policies
unrelated to the matter in suit
4. To create conditions to receive the
most accurate facts in trials
5. To manage the scope and duration of
trials
In the
United States, the federal courts must follow the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE);
state courts generally follow their own rules, which are generally imposed by
the various state legislatures upon their respective state courts. The FRE is
the most influential body of American evidence law. The FRE encompasses the
majority of the laws of evidence in 68 brief sections. Its language is
accessible, easy to read, and mostly free of technical jargon and complicated
cross-referencing. The FRE has been enormously influential in the development
of U. S. evidence law. This influence in part is a result of its brevity and
simplicity.
Before 1975,
U. S. evidence law was mostly a creature of the COMMON LAW tradition. The FRE
was drafted and proposed by a distinguished advisory committee composed of
practitioners, judges, and law professors appointed by the United States
Supreme Court. Just 20 years after the FRE was adopted in the federal system,
almost three-quarters of the states had adopted codes that closely resemble the
FRE.
The FRE
applies in all federal courts in both criminal and civil cases. Understanding
some of the basic provisions of the FRE will enable most people to figure out
what is going on at trial, even if there are deviations between the FRE and
applicable state laws of evidence.
Evidence
comes in four basic forms:
1. Demonstrative evidence
2. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
3. REAL EVIDENCE
4. Testimonial evidence
Some rules
of evidence apply to all four types and some rules apply to one or two of them.
All of these forms of evidence must be ADMISSIBLE, though, before they can be considered
as probative of an issue in a trial.
Basically,
if evidence is to be admitted at court, it must be relevant, material, and
competent. To be considered relevant, it must have some reasonable tendency to
help prove or disprove some fact. It need not make the fact certain, but at
least it must tend to increase or decrease the likelihood of some fact. Once
admitted as relevant evidence, the finder of fact (judge or jury) will
determine the appropriate weight to give a particular piece of evidence. A given
piece of evidence is considered material if it is offered to prove a fact that
is in dispute in a case. Competent evidence is that evidence that accords with
certain traditional notions of reliability. Courts are gradually diminishing
the competency rules of evidence by making them issues related to the WEIGHT OF
EVIDENCE.
Real
evidence is a thing. Its existence or characteristics are considered relevant
and material to an issue in a trial. It is usually a thing that was directly
involved in some event in the case, such as a murder weapon, the personal
effects of a victim, or an artifact like a cigarette or lighter belonging to a
suspect. Real evidence must be relevant, material, and competent before a judge
will permit its use in a trial. The process whereby a lawyer establishes these
basic prerequisites (and any additional ones that may apply), is called laying
a foundation. In most cases, the relevance and materiality of real evidence are
obvious. A lawyer establishes the evidence's competence by showing that it
really is what it is supposed to be. Establishing that real or other evidence
is what it purports to be is called AUTHENTICATION.
Evidence is
considered "demonstrative" if it demonstrates or illustrates the
TESTIMONY of a witness. It is admissible when it fairly and accurately reflects
the witness's testimony and is otherwise unobjectionable. Maps, diagrams of a
crime scene, charts and graphs that illustrate profits and losses are examples
of demonstrative evidence.
Evidence
contained in or on documents can be a form of real evidence. For example, a
contract offered to prove the terms it contains is both documentary and real
evidence. When a party offers a document into evidence, the party must
authenticate it the same way as any other real evidence, either by a witness
who can identify the document or by witnesses who can establish a chain of
CUSTODY for the document.
When people
deal with documentary evidence, it is a good idea to consider these four
potential pitfalls:
·
Parol
evidence
·
Best
evidence
·
Authentication
·
HEARSAY
The parol
evidence rule prohibits the admission of certain evidence concerning the terms
of a written agreement. Parol evidence is usually considered an issue of
substantive law, rather than a pure evidentiary matter.
A party can
authenticate documentary evidence in much the same way as it can authenticate
other real evidence. Also, some kinds of documents are essentially
self-authenticating under the FRE. Some of these are:
·
Acknowledged
documents to prove the acknowledgment
·
Certain
COMMERCIAL PAPER and related documents
·
Certificates
of the custodians of business records
·
Certified
copies of public records
·
Newspapers
·
Official
documents
·
Periodicals
·
Trade
inscriptions
The best
evidence rule states that when the contents of a written document are offered
in evidence, the court will not accept a copy or other proof of the document's
content in place of the original document unless an adequate explanation is
offered for the absence of the original. The FRE permits the use of
mechanically reproduced documents unless one of the parties has raised a
genuine question about the accuracy of the copy or can somehow show that its
use would be unfair. Also under the FRE, summaries or compilations of lengthy
documents may be received into evidence as long as the other parties have made
the originals available for EXAMINATION.
Evidence
given in the form of testimony is perhaps the most basic type of evidence.
Testimonial evidence consists of what a competent witness at the proceeding in
question says in court. Generally, witnesses are competent if they meet four
broad requirements:
1. The witnesses must take the oath or
a substitute and understand the oath,
2. The witnesses must have personal
knowledge about the subject of their testimony.
3. The witnesses must recall what was
perceived
4. The witnesses must be able to
communicate what they perceived
The courts
interpret competency quite liberally, which means that testimony based on the competency
of a witness is rarely excluded
If at trial
witnesses forgets their testimony, the attorney may help to refresh their
memory in four ways:
1. First, the attorney can ask the
judge for a recess to allow the witnesses time to calm down or otherwise collect
themselves.
2. Second, the attorney can ask the
witnesses a LEADING QUESTION to try to refresh their memory.
3. Third, the attorney can attempt to
refresh the witness's recollection through a process known as past recollection
refreshed. The witnesses must first say that they cannot remember the facts the
attorney is trying to elicit from them. Then they must say that the refreshing
object might help him them to remember. Almost anything that they says might
help them can be used to help refresh their memory such as notes, photographs,
an item of clothing, a smell, or some other object of some sort.
4. Fourth, the attorney can offer a
writing as a past recollection recorded. The witnesses must first claim that
they cannot remember the facts the attorney is trying to elicit from her. Next,
the attorney presents the writing or other recording the attorney intended to
use for the witness. If the attorney can refresh the witness's memory, they
will be allowed to answer the question. If the writing does not refresh their
memory, they must then identify the writing as one that they made or saw when
hey did remember the fact in question and that they knew then that the writing
was accurate.
A leading
question actually suggests an answer or substitutes the words of the
questioning attorney for those of the witness. Many leading questions call for
answers of either "yes" or "no." But not all questions that
call for an answer of "yes" or "no" are leading questions.
Judges have
discretion to allow leading questions during the DIRECT EXAMINATION of a
witness when the questions have the following traits:
·
Deal with
simple background issues
·
Will help to
elicit the testimony of a witness who, due to age, incapacity, or limited
intelligence, is having difficulty communicating her evidence
·
Are asked of
an adverse or hostile witness. Witnesses are considered adverse or hostile when
their interests or sympathies may lead them to resist testifying truthfully. In
most cases, an adverse party or a witness associated with an adverse party is
considered hostile for the purposes of this rule
Questions
that call for a narrative answer are more or less the opposite of leading
questions. Questions that call for a narrative often produce long speeches that
can waste the time of the court and the parties. These kinds of questions are
very unpopular with courts and should be avoided.
During CROSS-EXAMINATION, attorneys may only
ask about subjects that were raised upon the direct examination of the witness,
including CREDIBILITY. If cross-examiners stray into a new topical area, the
judge may permit them to do so in the interest of time or efficiency, but
harassment of the witness is not permitted under any circumstances.
Witnesses
must answer questions in the form of statements of what they saw, heard, felt,
tasted, or smelled. Usually they are not permitted to express their opinions or
draw conclusions. Under the FRE, a court will permit a person who is not
testifying as an expert to TESTIFY in the form of an opinion if the opinion is
both rationally based on his perception and helps to explain the witness's
testimony. Additionally, a competent layperson may provide opinions on certain
subjects that are specifically permitted by rule, STATUTE, or CASE LAW. Some of
these are:
·
Another
person's identity
·
Another
person's sanity
·
Demeanor,
mood, or intent
·
Identification
of handwriting
·
Intoxication
or sobriety
·
Ownership
·
The state of
health, sickness, or injury
·
Speed,
distance, and size
·
The value of
a witness's own property
Opinion
testimony is not necessarily objectionable even if such testimony goes to the
ultimate issue to be decided in the trial
Extrinsic
evidence is evidence other than the answers of the witness whose testimony is
being impeached. It may be offered to prove facts relevant to impeaching a
witness. In addition to extrinsic evidence, a party may attack the credibility
of another witness by attempting to show that the witness is or has:
1. Bias, prejudice, interest in the
issue, or corruption
2. Criminal convictions, or other prior
bad acts
3. Prior inconsistent statements
4. An untruthful character
There are
some limits to questioning a witness about a prior criminal CONVICTION.
However, according to the FRE, a witness may generally be questioned about
criminal convictions when the crime was punishable by a sentence of more than a
year or involved FRAUD or a false statement such as PERJURY. Before people
attempt to use such evidence in a trial, they need to understand the limits to
this kind of evidence.
The FRE
allows questions about prior bad acts of a witness to IMPEACH that witness's
credibility where, in the court's discretion, the questions will help get at
the truth. Thus, an attorney may ask questions about prior inconsistent
statements if the following apply:
·
The
questioner has a GOOD FAITH basis for believing that the witness made an
inconsistent statement
·
The witness
needs to be reminded of the time, place, and circumstances of the prior
statement
·
If the
statement is written, a copy of the written statement must be provided to the
opposing COUNSEL upon request
Another way
to impeach the testimony of a witness is to show that the witness has a
character of untruthfulness. This departure from the basic rule states a party
may not provide evidence of a witness's character to show that the witness
acted in conformity with that character trait. The FRE permits evidence to
prove a witness has a character of untruthfulness in:
·
Testimony of
specific instances of untruthfulness
·
The opinion
of another witness concerning the honesty of another witness's character
·
Testimony
about the target witness's reputation for truthfulness in the community
It is
important to know that a witness whose testimony is used to impeach the
truthfulness of another witness may in turn be impeached
Character is
a general quality usually attributed to a person. Character cannot be used to
show that someone acted on a particular occasion in conformity with a
particular character trait. On the other hand, habit can be used that way. A
habit is a behavior; it is specific, regular, and consistently repeated.
Occasionally, some character traits can be linked with a habit, so the
distinction between the two can be hard to make at times.
In civil
cases, evidence that a person has a character trait generally cannot be used to
prove that the person acted in conformity with that character trait on a
particular occasion. Evidence of character may be proved where it is an
integral issue in a dispute or where a party puts character in issue. Evidence
of character is used frequently in criminal trials during the sentencing stage
to show that a convicted DEFENDANT merits a lesser or greater sentence or other
PENALTY.
The rule
against hearsay is deceptively simple and full of exceptions. Hearsay is an out
of court statement, made in court, to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
In other words, hearsay is evidence of a statement that was made other than by
a witness while testifying at the HEARING in question and that is offered to
prove the truth of the matter stated. For example, Witness A in a murder trial
claimed on the stand: "Witness B (the "declarant") told me that
the defendant killed the victim." The definition of hearsay is not too
difficult to understand. But the matter can become very confusing when one
considers all of the many exceptions to the general rule against hearsay.
Even if a
statement meets the requirements for hearsay, the statement may yet be
admissible under one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule. The FRE contains
nearly thirty of these exceptions. Most of them are generally available,
although a few of them are limited to times when the declarant is unavailable.
There are
twenty-four exceptions in the federal rules that do not require proof that the
person who made the statement is unavailable. These are:
1. Business records, including those of
a public agency
2. Certain public records and reports
3. Evidence of a judgment of conviction
for certain purposes
4. Evidence of the absence of a
business record or entry
5. Excited utterances or spontaneous
statements
6. Family records concerning family
history
7. Judgments of a court concerning
personal history, family history, general history, or BOUNDARIES, where those
matters were essential to the judgment
8. Learned treatises used to question
an expert witness
9. Market reports, commercial
publications, and the like
10.
Marriage,
baptismal, and similar certificates
11.
Past
recollections recorded
12.
Recorded
documents purporting to affect interests in land
13.
Records of
religious organizations concerning personal or family history
14.
Records of
vital statistics
15.
Reputation
concerning boundaries or general history
16.
Reputation
concerning family history
17.
Reputation
of a person's character
18.
Statements
about the declarant's present sense impressions
19.
Statements
about the declarant's then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition
20.
Statements
in authentic ancient documents (at least 20 years old)
21.
Statements
in other documents purporting to affect interests in land and relevant to the
purpose of the document
22.
Statements
made by the declarant for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment
23.
Statements
of the absence of a public record or entry
24.
The
"catchall" rule
The last
exception, the so-called "catchall" rule, bears some explanation.
This rule does not require that the declarant be unavailable to testify. It
does say that evidence of a hearsay statement not included in one of the other
exceptions may nevertheless be admitted if it meets these following conditions:
·
It has sound
guarantees of trustworthiness
·
It is
offered to help prove a material fact
·
It is more
probative than other equivalent and reasonably obtainable evidence
·
Its
admission would forward the cause of justice
·
The other
parties have been notified that it will be offered into evidence
In general
terms, privileges are rights held by individuals that permit them to refuse to
provide evidence or to prevent certain evidence from being offered against
them. Privileges exist only to serve specific interests and relationships;
courts give them narrow scope.
Privileges
are more or less disfavored by the courts because they run contrary to the
principle that all relevant evidence should be admitted in a search for truth.
Accordingly, the persons or entities whose confidentiality they are meant to
shield or protect can waive their privileges. Individuals who possess a
privilege are known as "holders" of the privilege. Often, the
nonholder who is a party to a privileged communication must assert the
privilege on behalf of the holder.
Congress
could not agree on how to make laws regarding privileges, so this area was left
up to the courts and to state law to define. Thus, under the FRE, when a party
offers evidence on a federal claim the applicable privileges are determined by
the federal case law. When a party offers evidence on a state claim, the
state's law of privilege applies. The federal law of privilege is still
developing, and the federal courts are usually less tolerant of parties' claims
to privileges than are state courts.
Previously,
there was a good deal of controversy among legal professionals and scholars
over the effect of presumptions, but these have largely ended, at least in the
federal system. Presumptions are just that, a presumption that certain evidence
is what it is on its face. Sometimes, however, a presumption can be rebutted by
other evidence. There are two kinds of rebuttable presumptions: those that
affect the burden of producing evidence and those that affect the burden of
proof. In most cases, courts interpret presumptions as rebuttable. A list of
rebuttable presumptions includes the following:
·
That a
letter that has been correctly addressed and properly mailed is received by the
addressee in the ordinary course of the mail
·
That a
person who possesses a thing is also the owner of that thing
·
That a
writing is dated accurately
·
That a
written obligation that has been surrendered to the DEBTOR has been paid by the
debtor (and vice versa)
·
That some
specific ancient documents are authentic
·
That
statements in the records of a process server are true
·
That when a
receipt for a payment on an INSTALLMENT debt is given, the debtor has paid all
previous installment payments
·
That the
defendant was negligent when the requirements of res ipsa loquitur have been proven
·
The
presumptions that money or property delivered is in fact owed to the recipient
A
presumption is not considered evidence. But if an opponent to a presumption
puts on no evidence to rebut the presumption, the judge or jury must assume the
existence of the presumed fact. On the other hand, if an opponent to a
presumption does provide evidence to rebut the presumption, the presumption has
no further effect.
Sometimes,
the need for evidence on an issue in a case can be satisfied through formal
admissions, stipulations, and judicial notice. Likewise, under the FRE, a judge
may take judicial notice of facts that are not in issue because they are either
generally known (e.g. George Washington was the first president of the United
States), or they can be accurately and readily determined (e.g. the exact time
of sunrise on a particular day). In addition, state and federal courts can take
judicial notice of the laws of the states and of the federal system.
An
Introduction to the Law of Evidence. Lilly, Graham C., West Wadsworth, 1996.
Evidence 2nd ed., Mueller, Christopher B.,
and Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1999.
Federal
Evidence 4th ed., Weissenberger, Glen, and James J. Duane. Anderson Publishing
Company, 2001.
"Federal
Rules of Evidence." Legal Information Institute, 2002. Available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/overview.html. Legal Information Institute, 2002.
Federal
Rules of Evidence in a Nutshell, 5th Ed. 5th ed., Graham, Michael H., West Publishing, 2001.
The New
Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility:
Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values. Leonard, David P., and Richard D.
Friedman, editors., Aspen Law & Business, 2002.
Trial
Evidence, Second Edition. 2nd ed., Mauet, Thomas A., and Warren D. Wolfson. Aspen Law & Business,
2001.
Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar
Association (ABA)
740 15th Street, NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-1009 USA
Phone: (202) 662-1500
Fax: (202) 662-1501
URL: http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/home.html
740 15th Street, NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-1009 USA
Phone: (202) 662-1500
Fax: (202) 662-1501
URL: http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/home.html
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
(NACDL)
1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 901
Washington, DC 20036 USA
Phone: (202) 872-8600
Fax: (202) 872-8690
E-Mail: assist@n acdl.org
URL: www.nacdl.org
1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 901
Washington, DC 20036 USA
Phone: (202) 872-8600
Fax: (202) 872-8690
E-Mail: assist@n acdl.org
URL: www.nacdl.org
National District Attorneys Association
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510
Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
Phone: (703) 549-9222
Fax: (703) 836-3195
URL: http://www.ndaa.org/index.html
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510
Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
Phone: (703) 549-9222
Fax: (703) 836-3195
URL: http://www.ndaa.org/index.html
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)